The evidence associated with the 9/11 attacks, when analyzed carefully, indicates that 9/11 was an incredibly heinous type of crime-- synthetic terrorism, manufactured by the state to kill, frighten and intimidate its own citizens.
There are hundreds of ways that the official 9/11 story is wrong. The first real tip-off for me that something seriously was wrong with the official 9/11 story was the fact that on the morning of 9/11, LIVE-FLY HIJACKING DRILLS were being run by NORAD. This simple fact should easily set-off alarm bells in any thinking person.
Best Example of State-Sponsored False-Flag against one's own citizens (Synthetic Terrorism)
-- Italy's "Strategy of Tension" in the 1970's and 1980's; Operation Gladio
Best Example of US Considering Synthetic Terrorism
-- Operation Northwoods Plan (early 1960's)
Best Examples that 9/11 was not Unexpected
-- NORAD and other government agencies running terrorist hijacking drills and hijacked planes into building drills prior to 9/11
Best Example of General Forewarnings of 9/11
-- FBI whistle-blowers warning of Arabs in flight schools
Best Example of Specific Forewarnings of 9/11
-- Suspicious trading of American Airlines and United Airlines stocks right before 9/11 (trades were not by the terrorists since story has been covered up)
Best Examples that US intelligence agencies knew about the attacks
-- Extensive interactions between CIA, Pakistani Intelligence Services (ISI), Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden: contacts went back to when US supported the Afghanistan Muhajadeen against the UUSR
-- Pakistani ISI Chief (General Ahmed) approved money transfer to lead 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta
-- FBI informant lived with two 9/11 hijackers in San Diego right before attacks
-- FBI agents told government lawyer David Schippers specific time and date for 9/11 attacks
Best Examples that there is more to the 9/11 story than the official version
-- Live-fly hijacking exercise and mutiple other wargames run by NORAD on 9/11
-- National Reconnaissance Office (NRO, in charge of satellite monitoring) was running a plane into building exercise on 9/11
-- Not one of the eight pilots on the four hijacked planes signaled they were hijacked to air traffic control: how did knife and boxcutter-armed hijackers manage surprise take-overs on every plane?
-- the hijackers should not have been able to to fly jumbo jets effectively with their level of training
-- Perfectly controlled collapse of WTC building 7, a 47 story building housing several government agencies including the CIA and Secret Service: building had only a limited fire and was not hit by an airplane
-- Witnesses described bombs in WTC towers: officials and media have covered this up
-- Rudy Giuliani was told WTC towers would collapse right before it happened yet the collapse was completely unexpected by most people
-- WTC towers had massive central core section that was built to withstand impact with large jet airliner: WTC structure has been misleadingly portrayed by the media to promote pancake collapse story
-- Jet fuel fires should not have been hot to enough to weaken steel beams in WTC tower core
-- Strange and very difficult flight path taken by flight 77 pilot to hit Pentagon
-- Damage to Pentagon limited to recently renovated and sparsely occupied part of building
-- Complete lack of air defenses over Washington DC on 9/11 when DC should have been a top priority for air defense and hijacked planes were heading back towards the area
-- President Bush's Air Force One plane was threatened with attack using secret code words that only top level government officials knew
Best Examples of Administration Cover-Up
-- Stonewalling of appointment of the 9/11 commission
-- Appointment of Henry Kissinger initially to chair the commission
-- Limited time and budget allotted to 9/11 commission
-- Bush and Cheney testify to commission together
-- Complete lack of mention of the NORAD wargames running on 9/11 in the 9/11 commission report
-- US forces ISI Chief General Ahmed into retirement
-- Terrorist connections to the information services company P-tech which had access to FAA and other important government databases
-- Sibel Edmonds, the former FBI-translator, is being gagged from telling what she knows about 9/11
Reasons and Motives for 9/11
-- geopolitical strategy, maintenance of US global dominance by creating permanent US bases in middle east and asia
-- incitement to war to capture middle-east and asian oil reserves
-- disgruntled military officers wanted a war after many years of relative inaction
-- Neocon motives: clash of civilzations with the west and Islam; Islam perceived as threat to long-term US global dominance and to Israel
-- Massive insurance fraud by Larry Silverstein, owner of WTC, and others
-- Establishes political dominance by Republicans/Conservatives-- provides all purpose cover for radical government policies
A KEY PART OF understanding what really happened on 9/11 is understanding that in fact, the plane hijackings and crashes on 9/11 were a massive hoax. As difficult as this may be to believe, this simple idea meshes quite well with the fact, alluded to above, that NORAD was running live hijacking drills on the morning of 9/11.
When analyzed carefully, the evidence indicates that all four 9/11 plane crashes were actually clever fakes. A good place to start with this concept is the "UA93" crash in Shanksville with its amazing plane-shaped hole and amazing absence of plane debris. This bizarre crash scene theme holds up not only for the "AA77" crash at the Pentagon, but surprisingly it also holds up for the WTC attacks by "AA11" and even the plane everyone saw the videos of: "UA175". Keep in mind that the Operation Northwoods Plan from the 1960's proposed faking plane crashes to spark war with Cuba. At this site there are many references for the "no-plane theory". The "no plane" theory is an important concept for understanding the 9/11 hoax, and this theory proposes that the 9/11 plane crashes were faked through a combination of means, including planted parts, explosives, missiles and video fakery. Of particular note is the fact that the major news networks telecast fraudulent images of the "2nd plane"-- "UA175" (see here and here and here and here for instance). The obvious proof of this fraud is that many 2nd hit videos show a plane that is too small for a 767. The idea that hijacked commercial planes crashed on 9/11 is an example of "The Big Lie Technique"-- a lie so large and outrageous, very few dare to disbelieve it. Also, note that NOT using large commercial aircraft on 9/11 had important operational advantages.
Yes, everyone saw the plane hit the South tower. On TELEVISION!
In fact, there were some people who were in a position to see the second plane, and never saw it.
Yes, this may all seem very far-fetched, even crazy-- until you start looking at the evidence. Please take time to look at the evidence. Here is a summary of the evidence for no plane at the South tower.
Thus, a related topic that is critical to understanding 9/11 is "TV fakery" and the complicity of the media in carrying out the 9/11 operation. Along the side panel of this blog and throughout the posts there, there are references for 9/11 video fakery. This is an incredibly important topic for understanding the 9/11 hoax.
Beyond the plane fakery however, lies an even deeper darker truth: the destruction of the World Trade center towers by small nuclear bombs.
It should be clear to everyone that the towers were demolished using extremely powerful explosive devices that were pre-planted in the towers. A person only needs to look at the official NIST model for the tower collapses-- and then realize that NIST never even was able to model the global collapses!-- to see how ludicrous the official story is. More on why the official WTC "collapse" story is impossible is detailed here. Detailed refutations of official WTC research can be found here.
In fact, the evidence associated with the destruction of the trade center twin towers indicates that small nuclear (primarily fusion) bombs were used to blast the towers. These nuclear blasts vaporized much of the inner structure of the towers and also rendered the remaining inner contents of the towers into fine dust. Important evidence for nuclear destruction of the WTC is the molten metal and extremely hot rubble that was found at Ground Zero. This phenomenon of molten steel and high heat in the WTC debris can be explained by a small scale "China Syndrome" reaction from unexploded nuclear devices that underwent criticality. The increasingly common reports of cancers from people who worked at Ground Zero lend further support to the idea of nuclear devices at Ground Zero.
More information about the nuclear demolition of the WTC can be found here. Of course, other mechanisms besides (or in conjunction with) nuclear weapons may have been used to take down the towers, and it is not entirely resolved what specific devices were used.
If you want a more simple proof that the official 9/11 story is very wrong, see HERE or HERE. The context for this proof and how I define "proof" is: HERE.
50 suspicious mainstream FACTS about 9/11, that do not even include the hijacking drills, are here.
9/11 was a psychological operation (psy-ops) on a massive scale, and had massive effects on the US and the world. A good summary of these effects can be read here.
However, in terms of the deeper truth of 9/11, it should be no surprise that the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 did not develop out of the blue in just the few years before 9/11/01. Rather, 9/11 was likely the product of a secret and very deep global conspiracy whose goals we can only make educated guesses about.
